Thursday, 22 January 2015

Finger temperature and electrodermal response-- what they can tell us.


Frank and Mary Deitz were pioneers in the development of biofeedback systems. Their F1000 was one of the first relatively affordable and robust systems that integrated EEG, EMG, heart rate variability, respiration, temperature, and electrodermal response (EDR).

The attached chart was developed by them to show the relationship between measures of finger temperature and EDR, both of which indicate what is going on at the autonomic level.  By combing these two measures, it is possible to obtain a great deal of information about how someone is responding physiologically and, by inference, psychologically.

For instance, I have regularly asked clients to meditate on the breath and recorded their finger temperature and EDR.  Usually, the first time around, before they have practiced, what appears is rather erratic.  However, after a week or two of practice, I begin to see what to me is a relaxation response as they meditate.  Their finger temperature increases and their EDR decreases, but they remain responsive to thoughts or sensations that occur to them and to environmental events.  What this suggests, in accordance with the chart, is that they have an open circulatory system and a quiet, but still responsive, arousal system

When I have used these measures with clients who have practiced open monitoring with noting, a slightly different profile emerges.  Their temperature increases. but the EDR varies, presumably in response to their noting activity.  This suggests that while they are relaxed, as indicated by the increase in finger temperature, they are actively engaged and responsive to what is occurring to them.

Sunday, 4 January 2015

Biosignals and the quantified self

Here is a Ted talk and an interview with Fu-Chiek Hsu of Op-Innovations, a company that makes affordable and versatile biosignal devices (more about this later).

This is a good introduction to the whole idea of measuring biosignals:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BLUXKOSfZ4

This provides a more informal and very insightful discussion of why it is useful to use biosignal devices:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8dHM4jzCTY


Friday, 2 January 2015

Musing--the problem with feedback

I plan a series of reflections, not so much on the Muse specifically, but on the issues that it and other similar devices raise.  This first musing is on the issue of feedback during meditation, especially auditory, which is used in the Calm app.

Ideally, there would be no need for feedback when we meditate.  We should be able to notice when our mind is focused and when it is distracted.  But this requires practice, and, even with practice, it is sometimes difficult to maintain the appropriate focus and awareness.  So this is where devices such as the Muse might prove helpful.

However, the biggest issue with using feedback technologies with meditation is that certain types of feedback can actually interfere with the activity they are designed to assist.

Let's assume we are doing focused attention meditation on the breath.

If I am remaining focused and not wandering, having any kind of feedback is likely to interfere with my focus.  If I am truly focused on the breath, I should be aware that I am focused on the breath.  I really don't need positive reinforcement.  On the other hand, if my mind is wandering and not focused, I may need to be alerted to this fact, reminding me that I should resume attention to the breath.  Over time, I may become more sensitive to the wandering and more able to readily return to the breath without the warning.

Auditory feedback is a readily available form of feedback, especially when we are already listening to instructions from the app via headphones or speakers.   However, it is common sense that attention to external stimuli such as sound will conflict with attention to the breath.  Whereas attention to the breath activates the interoceptive cortex (Farb et al, 2013), sound activates the auditory cortex.  If my mind is wandering anyway, this auditory "distraction" should not pose a great difficulty.  However, it should be momentary and only repeated long enough for me to recognize that I must redirect my attention.  If the auditory feedback is anything more than a quick reminder, it is likely to become a problem.

The Calm app provides different forms of auditory feedback.  Both the wind and the waves are giving feedback about the degree to which the mind is active.  The wind supposedly represents current activity, whereas the waves represent activity over a more extended time-frame.  Both the wind and waves vary in intensity and are continuous rather than discrete sounds.  The birds are supposed to represent a calm mind, and they reward you for maintaining calm over a period of time.  If I hear any of these sounds, they are very likely to become items of interest in themselves, thereby distracting me from focusing on the breath.  Also this kind of feedback is likely to stimulate evaluation and judgement--"I am doing well," "I am not doing well," and so on.

Whether different forms of feedback would make a difference or not remains to be seen.  Haptic feedback (see http://www.arcwearables.com) might cause less conflict than auditory feedback, for instance.  On the other hand, with auditory feedback it might be possible to provide more differentiated feedback that sensitizes the user to the type of activity that is going on.  In which case the feedback would not so much function as a warning (wind and waves) or as positive reinforcement (birds), but as information about what is going on.

These issues challenge the concept of using a device such as this as a meditation aide.  It is to be hoped that appropriate research will be done to determine whether the Muse (and other devices like it) can be useful for the purpose of assisting meditation.

Farb, N. A., Segal, Z. V., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Attentional modulation of primary interoceptive and exteroceptive cortices. Cerebral cortex, 23(1), 114-126.


Friday, 28 November 2014

Muse review updated December 28, 2014

I received the Muse on November 27th.  Here are my impressions so far:
1)  The Muse has been well-designed from aesthetic and ergonomic standpoints and is no more intrusive than a pair of glasses.  Unlike the NeuroSky device, it is very comfortable and expands for an extra-large head size.  Setting up and getting the application to work was trouble-free on my Galaxy Note 8.0 tablet.  There is an FAQ site that answers a great many questions, although not all that I had, but my contact at Interaxon has been extremely helpful in clarifying the additional questions that I had.
2)  The Calm (downloaded for free) is the only app that is available at present.  It is designed to facilitate and train calm focus.  It differentiates between calm, active, and neutral states. These states are not defined in terms of EEG bandwidths, which is apparently proprietary information.  Granted, but it is unclear what is meant by these different states.  Is "active" the same as wandering (which is what the documentation says) or does it include active thinking as in problem solving?  Would it not make sense to differentiate active thinking from wandering (see my post, Automating on the road to mindfulness, dated 11/5/12)?  And what does "neutral" represent?  All that we are told is that it is somewhere in between calm and active.
3)  The Calm app provides a diagram of the quality of the connections from the different sensors as well as an indication of noise.  This is essential information to ensure that you are getting proper readings.  I have not had much trouble in getting good readings on myself, but I tried the Muse on one of my daughters and had great difficulty getting one of the sensors to show up on the diagram.  What I discovered was that the band was not touching her forehead no matter how I adjusted it.  (She has a rather oblong rather than round head.)  I had to insert a wedge under the band in order to get the sensor to touch her forehead.  
4)  There is also a calibration exercise at the outset.  This is a good idea as it has the potential for getting an individual profile on how your mind works.  The exercise is a semantic fluency task common to many psychological tests.  This type of activity is supposed to correlate with frontal and temporal areas, which is where the sensors are, and draws on semantic memory.  However, it is not clear how this kind of cognitive activity specifically relates to what is supposed to be measured by the Calm.
5)  The instructions for the Calm app ask that you count your breaths.  Although this is a standard meditation technique, I have always preferred noting the breath as in the Mahasi technique.  Initially, it did not seem to matter whether I counted my breaths or simply noted them.  I thought it would probably work for any technique that has a single object focus (focused attention or FA), but I doubted whether it would work as well with an open monitoring (OM) or mindfulness meditation technique, which has a different brainwave profile.  However, over time and having amassed many hours of use of the Muse, both using the feedback from the app and using the app with the sound off to simply to monitor different ways of meditating, I am beginning to wonder whether the technique I use is the primary determinant of the calm score I obtain.  (More about this later.) 
6)  The sound feedback is pleasant enough consisting as it does of water lapping on the shore and stormy winds.  In the supporting documentation, the wind is clearly identified as representing wandering, but there is also reference to environmental sounds, which presumably include the lapping waves.  I asked about this and was told that, while the wind represents activity as it occurs, the waves reflect longer term activity:  "The wave sound gradually gets quieter throughout the session if you keep the winds calm enough."  This is helpful information as I had difficulty understanding how the wave sound worked as it seemed to be independent of the wind.
7)  In my experience, while I can quiet the wind sound, the waves are more or less constant throughout, although they vary in intensity.  I question the value of having such constant sound as this can be quite distracting in itself.  In a future post, I will explain why this presence of more or less constant sound undermines the intent to focus on the breath.  Because of how distracting the sounds were to me, I prefer to run the app with the sound off and use it just to monitor my meditation.  I found I achieved a better calm score with the sound off than I did with the sound on.  This may be because I have meditated on my own for a number of years and know how to calm my mind.  Also, because I have mainly practiced with an open monitoring style of mindfulness meditation, my mind may have a tendency to go to these environmental sounds, especially as they kick up and become more prominent.   
8)  The data provided by the app is quite helpful and allows you to review with graphs the profile of active, calm, and neutral throughout the session and to review moment by moment what occurred in terms of these different states.  After you achieve a score of 5000, the Muse opens up to added features.  These features reflect basic statistics about what you have been doing with the Muse such as the time of day you practice, how long you practice, and suggestions about what you might do to improve your practice.  You can also review previous sessions and compare them in terms of how calm you were. 
9)  Given that there is not at present a variety of apps available, I would like to see the Muse made compatible with BioExplorer and/or BioEra, which are widely used in neurofeedback circles.  This would make it very easy for anyone familiar with either software to develop their own applications.  At the very least, I would like to see the raw EEG, preferably broken down into standard bandwidths.  I am advised that this is accessible with the developers’ kit, but it would nice if it was an included app rather than something that you have to program yourself.
10)  I have a concern about how substantial the main sensors are as they are placed on a very thin band.  The Muse team said that the strip could be replaced for free within 180 days.  I wonder whether the strip would last beyond that point with regular use.  We will see.

In summary, I have many questions and quibbles, but overall the Muse has many impressive features and a reasonably good app that appears to work in developing focused awareness.  The sound feedback is a major concern, but this is going to be a problem with any attempt to use this type of device to assist meditation when constant sound may act as a distraction.  As a long-term meditator, I prefer to use the Calm app to monitor my meditation rather than to assist it.  I look forward to more applications for the Muse to fulfill the promises that have been made for it.

Monday, 18 August 2014

Another update on available and promised wearable devices (November 28, 2014)

In November, 2012 I published a post on some of the available and promised "wearable" neuroshaping devices.  I updated it in April, 2014.  Not a lot has changed as far as availability. For some of the new devices, the general release dates keep being pushed forward.  However, the long anticipated Muse, is now available.

The MindWave from Neurosky is a one active channel device.  It has been available for a while. It retails for about $100 and comes with ten apps and many more are available (see http://www.neurosky.com/Products/MindWave.aspx).  I have tried it and it seems to work, and it is great that it can be used with third-party software such as BioExplorer and BioEra.  However, I find it very uncomfortable.  It might be fine for a child but not for someone with a big head like mine!
MindWave

There is an earlier version (MindSet), which was the first mass market neuroshaping device
introduced in 2009.  It has earphones and looks more comfortable.  It uses the same chip set as the MindWave.  NeuroSky provides a comparison chart that shows the capabilities of each of their products (see http://support.neurosky.com/kb/technology/what-are-the-differences-between-the-mindset-mindwave-mindwave-mobile-and-mindband).

Another company promises to introduce the Melon, originally called the Axio.  It is based on the NeuroSky chip.  It is an attractive and comfortable appearing three sensor band, which is adjustable to different head sizes.  Again, they exceeded their goal in crowd-
sourcing (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/806146824/melon-a-headband-and-mobile-app-to-measure-your-fo).
Melon
The developers of the Melon now have a website (www.thinkmelon.com).  The device was promised for the summer of 2014, but it still isn't available  Given that this device uses the NeuroSky chip, I thought it might make its original release date.  But, in this business, no one seems to meet their release dates.

Muse
Muse from Interaxon is now available (http://www.choosemuse.com).  Money was raised initially through an Indiegogo campaign, which quickly exceeded the goal, and more private money was raised subsequently.  It was originally to be released in the spring of 2013, but the date for its release was pushed forward several times. Prototypes were demonstrated at CES 2014 and received rave reviews. The marketing of it has been truly awe-inspiring.  It now can be obtained, although there is only one app for it, Calm, which is designed to develop focused awareness.

The Muse was developed with Interaxon's own chip set and technologies.  The device has seven sensors and four active channels (AFp3, AFp4, TP9, TP10), which are on the forehead and around the ears.  Detailed technical specifications are now available (http://s3.amazonaws.com/totem_production/assets/other/5987/Muse_-_Tech_Spec_Sheet_CES_-_2014.pdf?1387319049), and they look quite respectable.    

The producers of the Emotiv  EPOC 14 channel device are developing the INSIGHT, which is a five channel device.  Again, they exceeded their kickstarter goal of $100,000 by over $1.5 million (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/tanttle/emotiv-insight-optimize-your-brain-fitness-and-per).

INSIGHT
The technical specifications of the INSIGHT reveal that it will have five active channels at AF3, AF4, T7, T8, Pz with two references (see http://emotiv.co/product.php).  The EPOC required saline preparation, but the INSIGHT uses "a proprietory polymer sensor that offers great electrical conductivity without any preparation whatsoever."  This is the truly innovative aspect of this product. Also, these polymer sensors can be applied over hair, while the other products listed above only have sensors on areas free of hair.

The INSIGHT was originally promised for the summer of 2014, but the release date is now December 2014.

The ENOBIO from Neuroelectrics (http://www.neuroelectrics.com/enobio) is a very promising, but expensive high end device.  It comes in 8 channel, 20 channel and 32 channel configurations.  It uses dry electrodes and bluetooth.  This one is definitely on my wish list, and it is actually available now.









Please feel free to comment or, if you wish, direct questions and comments to me directly at drampsych at gmail.com.

Sunday, 10 August 2014